We claim to reward "merit". But who defines what merit is?
Select the lens through which to judge value.
* Note how the "Legacy" block exists regardless of the lens. The debate often focuses on racial preference while ignoring wealth preference.
"There is no such thing as a 'right' to be judged solely on academic criteria. Universities define their mission. If diversity serves that mission, then racial background is a valid merit."
The conflict isn't just about fairness; it's about the purpose of institutions. Is a university a prize for the smart, or a tool for social engineering?